1. Whether the First Amendment immunizes a political candidate from a private figure's defamation and false light claims where the candidate publishes an attack ad that makes statements of and concerning the private figure and whose implication could bear a defamatory meaning.

2. Whether under Milkovich's enhanced appellate review, an appellate court may usurp the jury's role by concluding that although a communication is capable of bearing a defamatory meaning, it would not likely be drawn by a reasonable listener.

Whether the First Amendment immunizes a political candidate from a private figure's defamation-and-false-light-claims,whether-under-Milkovich's-enhanced-appellate-review-an-appellate-court-may-usurp-the-jury's-role