No. 21-1381
Enrique Vazquez-Quintana v. Jose Alberto Morales-Rodriguez, et al.
Tags: civil-rights court-ruling democratic-system due-process expert-testimony free-speech medical-decision medical-expertise scientific-evidence standing
Latest Conference:
2022-06-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. In a democratic system, can a court of any hierarchy issue a ruling regarding a consensual medical decision that dismisses, refutes, or ignores the scientific facts verified and supported by the scientific community and the medical literature?
2. Should scientists and academicians tolerate a court decision resulting from a false statement that ignores or invalidates their extensive education, research, and expertise in matters of accepted scientific evidence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a court issue a ruling dismissing scientific facts?
Docket Entries
2022-08-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-07-28
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-07-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-06-27
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 26, 2022)
Attorneys
Enrique Vazquez-Quintana
Enrique Vazquez-Quintana — Petitioner