No. 21-1380
Seun Banjo Ojedokun v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-cases congressional-intent criminal-statute extraterritorial-application presumption-against-extraterritoriality statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
The question presented is: Whether, as in civil cases, a clear indication of congressional intent is required to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of a United States criminal statute.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, as in civil cases, a clear indication of congressional intent is required to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of a United States criminal statute
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 26, 2022)
2022-02-15
Application (21A416) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 22, 2022.
2022-02-10
Application (21A416) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 21, 2022 to April 22, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Seun Banjo Ojedokun
Lawrence David Rosenberg — Jones Day, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent