No. 21-1364
Mordechai Korf, et al. v. United States
Amici (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: attorney-client-privilege civil-procedure department-of-justice filter-team government-attorneys judicial-review search search-and-seizure work-product-protection
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether filter-team procedures like the ones in this case are invalid because they undermine the attorney-client privilege and work-product protection.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether filter-team procedures like the ones in this case are invalid because they undermine the attorney-client-privilege
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-08
Reply of petitioners Mordechai Korf, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-07-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-06-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 21, 2022.
2022-06-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2022 to July 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-20
Brief amici curiae of Retired Federal Judges filed.
2022-05-20
Brief amici curiae of Professors of Criminal Law and Legal Ethics filed.
2022-05-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 21, 2022. See Rule 30.1.
2022-05-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 20, 2022 to June 20, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 20, 2022)
Attorneys
Mordechai Korf, et al.
Michael R. Dreeben — O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Petitioner
Professors of Criminal Law and Legal Ethics
Retired Federal Judges
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent