Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al.
I. Whether an incarcerated person must allege presently occurring or certain-to-occur serious physical injury in order to successfully invoke the "imminent danger of serious physical injury" exception to the Prison Litigation Reform Act "three-strikes" provision, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)?
II. Whether three cases challenging three chronologically distinct episodes of forcible shavings, but motivated by the same long-standing department policy are "duplicative," and therefore subject to sua sponte dismissal under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provision authorizing pre-service dismissal of "malicious" complaints, 28 U.S.C. § 1915A?
Whether an incarcerated person must allege presently occurring or certain-to-occur serious physical injury to invoke the 'imminent danger' exception under 28-U.S.C-1915(g)