No. 21-1321
Yan Sui v. Richard A. Marshack, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: bankruptcy bankruptcy-court civil-procedure civil-rights discharge-injunction due-process ninth-circuit property-rights standing summary-affirmance takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
Layperson Yan Sui is not legally trained to correctly raise the question for Court to decide. Sui has thought about these questions: (1) whether lower courts were lawless; (2) whether lower courts improperly barred remedies available under California laws; (3) whether Sui/Yang's residence was stolen; (4) whether lower courts' prior rulings retroactively facilitated the stealing of the residence by Trustee, Wells Fargo and Krusey.
Petitioner Sui respectfully prays to Court to sua sponte define a question from the facts and laws.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-lower-courts-were-lawless
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Richard A. Marshack, Chapter 7 Trustee to respond filed.
2022-04-07
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2022-03-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Richard A. Marshack, Chapter 7 Trustee
David Edward Hays — Marshack Hays LLP, Respondent
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Yan Sui
Yan Sui — Petitioner