No. 21-1319
Mark Nordlicht and David Levy v. United States
Amici (1)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: credibility criminal-procedure discretion district-court-discretion evidence-weighing federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure jury-verdict new-trial new-trial-motion rule-33 standard-of-review witness-credibility
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
FifthAmendment Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-09-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether district courts have discretion to weigh the evidence, including the credibility of witnesses, when deciding to grant a new trial under Rule 33, or whether they must defer to the jury's view of the evidence unless the evidence is patently incredible, defies physical realities, or is similarly flawed.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether district courts have discretion to weigh the evidence, including the credibility of witnesses, when deciding to grant a new trial under Rule 33, or whether they must defer to the jury's view of the evidence unless the evidence is patently incredible, defies physical realities, or is similarly flawed
Docket Entries
2022-10-03
Petition DENIED.
2022-08-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-08-10
Reply of petitioners Mark Nordlicht, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2022-07-27
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-07-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 27, 2022.
2022-07-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 6, 2022 to July 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 6, 2022.
2022-05-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 3, 2022 to July 6, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-04
Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jennifer L. Mascott filed.
2022-04-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 3, 2022.
2022-04-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 4, 2022 to June 3, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-03-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2022)
Attorneys
Mark Nordlicht, et al.
Steven Andrew Engel — Dechert LLP, Petitioner
Professor Jennifer L. Mascott
Jennifer Lee Mascott — Scalia Law School, Amicus
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent