No. 21-1303
Abigail Walsh, et al. v. Amy Cohen, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights class-action constitutional-rights due-process notice procedural-fairness rule-23 settlement settlement-revocation
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does the Constitutional Due Process driven analysis set forth in Rule 23 have exceptions?
2. If so, what exceptions and what circumstances trigger the District Court's authority to make such exceptions?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Constitutional Due Process driven analysis set forth in Rule 23 have exceptions?
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent Amy Cohen, et al., Plaintiff-Appellees below to respond filed.
2022-03-31
Waiver of right of respondents Brown University, Christina Paxson, as successor to Vartan Gregorian, and Jack Hayes, as successor to David Roach to respond filed.
2022-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)
2022-01-18
Application (21A330) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until March 26, 2022.
2022-01-12
Application (21A330) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 25, 2022 to March 26, 2022, submitted to Justice Breyer.
Attorneys
Abigail Walsh, et al.
Robert Bonsignore — Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, PLLC, Petitioner
Amy Cohen, et al., Plaintiff-Appellees below
Lynette Labinger — Lynette Labinger, Attorney at Law, Respondent
Brown University, Christina Paxson, as successor to Vartan Gregorian, and Jack Hayes, as successor to David Roach
Roberta A. Kaplan — Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, Respondent