No. 21-128
Roger Waldner, et al. v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process enforcement-order garnishment recoupment restitution statute-of-limitations takings-clause
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Would a GVR Order for a hearing below reveal that no court below gave Glenn a hearing on his recoupment defense?
2. Would a GVR-ordered hearing below likely result in recovery of the $80,000 without using much of this Court's limited docket?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the USA's garnishment of $80,000 from Glenn Ambort was timely and proper under 18 U.S.C. § 3664(m)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 3613
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Roger Waldner, et al.
Roger Dean Waldner — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent