Judy Wright v. May 27, 2011 Order, et al.
1. For Petitioner to have standing to be heard on her
claim that a "judgment" by a judge with an undenied
appearance of undermined neutrality, must Petitioner
allege and prove that Petitioner suffered harm from the
"judgment"?
2. Did Petitioner have standing, in this diversity (28
U.S.C. § 1332(1)) and federal question (28 U.S.C.
§ 1331) action, to plead a never-before-pled claim for
relief from a state court "judgment" adjudicated by a
judge, with an undenied appearance of undermined
neutrality?
3. Is the state court "judgment" adjudicated by a judge
with an undenied appearance of undermined
neutrality, named as the res in Petitioner's in rem
complaint subject to being set aside as coram non
judice ?
Does a petitioner require proof of harm to have standing to challenge a judgment by a judge with an appearance of undermined neutrality?