No. 21-1278

Judy Wright v. May 27, 2011 Order, et al.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure coram-non-judice diversity-jurisdiction due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-question in-rem-complaint judicial-bias judicial-neutrality standing standing-doctrine state-court-judgment
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. For Petitioner to have standing to be heard on her
claim that a "judgment" by a judge with an undenied
appearance of undermined neutrality, must Petitioner
allege and prove that Petitioner suffered harm from the
"judgment"?

2. Did Petitioner have standing, in this diversity (28
U.S.C. § 1332(1)) and federal question (28 U.S.C.
§ 1331) action, to plead a never-before-pled claim for
relief from a state court "judgment" adjudicated by a
judge, with an undenied appearance of undermined
neutrality?

3. Is the state court "judgment" adjudicated by a judge
with an undenied appearance of undermined
neutrality, named as the res in Petitioner's in rem
complaint subject to being set aside as coram non
judice ?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a petitioner require proof of harm to have standing to challenge a judgment by a judge with an appearance of undermined neutrality?

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 21, 2022)

Attorneys

Judy Wright
Larry Edward ParrishParrish Lawyers, P.C., Petitioner