Did the Court of Appeals err in finding that the petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his right of appeal without having considered the existence, nature and extent of the Rule 11 colloquy and did the court of appeals err in determining the scope of the appeal which the petitioner had waived including his right to appeal that part of the sentencing which exceeded the guidelines and that part of the sentencing which established the offense level?

Did the Court of Appeals err in finding that the petitioner knowingly and intelligently waived his right of appeal