No. 21-126
Lucio A. Barroga v. Board of Administration of California Public Employees' Retirement System
Relisted (2)
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-proceedings retirement-benefits statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
A) DID the refusal or denial of the MEMORANDUM of Feb. 23, 2021 and the
ORDER of May 26, 2021 to interpret the issues of questions of laws, ISSUES I, II,
III, IV and V in the p.2-5 MOTION FOR RELIEF of October 22, 2019, February 8,
2020 and the p.2-5 PETITION FOR REHEARING of March 5, 2021, regarding
retirement benefits with the California Public Employees' Retirement System,
" U.S. PERS, "departed from accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings
Supreme Court Rule 10, in violation of laws?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the refusal or denial of the MEMORANDUM and ORDER to interpret the issues of questions of laws violated laws
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-10-28
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-06-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Lucio A. Barroga
Lucio A. Barroga — Petitioner