Harassed for years, challenging subject matter jurisdiction was relevant; causation of breach of duty, tort, and trespassing without subject matter jurisdiction itself is simply frivolous matter. Jurisdiction challenged every proceedings turns into contempt court, harassment, threats, and abusive conviction. Accused of committing crime driving freely on public roads with SUSPENDED DRIVER LICENCE (DL contract never existed). Once the ID was out of contract, state of MN has no entitlement, the contract expire then. The individuals ' enter purposely, engaged in conduct that causes injury and damages. INDIVIDUALS IN THEIR OWN CAPACITY violated my rights given by GOD knowingly, diligently, purposely, wrongfully injured me with prejudice.

"The lord should judge the people with equity. "
Psalm 98:9

Administrative government courts, a contract is need it to be in place before that court can compel.

Existed NONE!

"Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proved."
Hagans v. Levine. 415 U.S. 533. n. 3.

• Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statutes at Large?
• If is not subject matter jurisdiction, aren 't you in violation of the federal law? Federal Constitution P.319US 113

II

• I claim that I'm not member of the government fiction law nor associate, I am flesh and blood man, could you verify personam jurisdictions over me, did you have subject matter jurisdiction?
• If you have financial interest, and you are on record not having subject matter jurisdiction, continuing to proceed isn't a violation of constitutional rights under 42 US codes 1983, 1985, 1986 you can sue everyone, year 1982 reports remove judicial immunity for violating someone 's rights. When the judge is involved in a scheme of bribery (conflict of interest); the Alemann cases, Bracey v. Warden, U.S. Supreme Court No. 96-6133; June 9, 1997).
• Administrative Commercial courts to be dysfunctional when Duo Process ignored, and law of the land imperil when Chief of Justice Douglas B Meslow and bench judge at that time Ted V. Jude telling you, "you can 't use law here, any statement of the law differs from the law I give you discard it" as I was instructed to follow their "rules " in an abusive trial? The individuals are liable for punitive money damages When a judge acts intentionally and knowingly to deprive a person of his constitutional rights he exercises no discretion or individual judgmen t: he acts no longer as a judge, but as a " minister" of his own prejudices. [386 U.S. 547. 5681: TORT! Is it in Conflict with the Supreme

III

law of the land Art VI paragraph 2? . Murduch v Pensvlvenva if a law has no other purpose than to chill assertation of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them it is unconstitutional. In cases where a law conflicted with the Constitution. Marshal wrote, then. " The very essence of judicial duty " was to follow the Constitution. " The U.S. Supreme Court, in Scheuer v. Rhodes. 416 U.S. 232. 94 S.Ct. 1683. 1687 (1974) stated that, "when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he

Whether the court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case, given the challenges to jurisdiction raised by the petitioner