Whether a Petitioner is entitled to a conservative summary judgement of 1 Billion dollars awarded after instructions on remand or another amount ordered by the Supreme Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2106, after 8 years of properly and accurately reporting to the District Court and Ninth Circuit the circumstances with appropriate application of law and code, providing analysis of issues warranting several awards for damages to total 7.1 Billion; first separately the 4 copyright claims with torts dismissed by executive order leading to an all-encompassing "mega complaint " at 4 Billion in damages and now nearing triplicate to include damages for: Nevada District Court 's dismissal violating racketeering laws as defined in 18 U.S.C. §1961 - (§1503(a), §1510, §1511, §1512, §1513, §2339A, §1992, §1962(c); and the Ninth Circuit 's affirmation of this and another order creating conclusive "pattern of dismissal ", a proven collaboration with these and other Defendant-Respondents to further Criminal Copyright Infringement conspiracy through organization;

and whether or not the Ninth Circuit panel(s) and the several judges of the lower courts with agencies who plotted to assassinate Petitioner and several members of his immediate family before resolution of the claims, should be charged criminally in violation of "RICO ".

Whether a Petitioner is entitled to a conservative summary judgement of 1 Billion dollars awarded