1. Whether the Tenth Circuit impermissibly expanded
the judicially-created doctrine of qualified immunity to
shield an officer where there is a substantial and material
dispute in the evidence.

2. Whether the Tenth Circuit majority impermissibly
usurped the role of the jury by resolving material factual
disputes in favor of the moving party on a motion for
summary judgment.

3. Whether the Tenth Circuit erred in holding that
an officer is entitled to qualified immunity on summary
judgment where there is a genuine dispute of fact as to
whether his use of excessive force was the result of his
own reckless or deliberate actions.

qualified-immunity