No. 21-1199

Sally Gaetjens v. City of Loves Park, Illinois, et al.

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-03-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights due-process emergency-aid exigent-circumstances fourth-amendment home-entry probable-cause standing warrant-requirement
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

This case squarely presents two important federal questions regarding the scope of the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement.

THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARE:

1. Whether the exigent circumstances doctrine extends to situations where there is time to obtain a warrant or other judicial process?

2. Whether, under this Court's emergency aid precedents, there can there be an objectively reasonable basis for a warrantless home entry where there is no specific evidence of serious injury or threat of such injury and where the only evidence regarding the individual's location points elsewhere?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the exigent circumstances doctrine extends to situations where there is time to obtain a warrant or other judicial process?

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Waiver of right of respondents Winnebago County, Illinois; Jennifer Stacy; Dave Kaske; and Joshua Del Rio to respond filed.
2022-03-16
Waiver of right of respondents City of Loves Park, Doug Allton & Phillip Foley to respond filed.
2021-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 1, 2022)

Attorneys

City of Loves Park, Dough Allton & Phillip Foley
Jennifer L. TurielloPeterson Johnson & Murray Chicago, LLC, Respondent
Sally Gaetjens
Andrew Donaldson FinkeBlaine & Vanzant, LLP, Petitioner
Winnebago County, Illinois; Jennifer Stacy; Dave Kaske; and Joshua Del Rio
Christopher J. DrinkwineHeyl Royster, Respondent