No. 21-119

Postmates, LLC, fka Postmates, Inc. v. Jacob Rimler, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-07-28
Status: Dismissed
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response Requested Experienced Counsel
Tags: california-labor-code contract-law epic-systems federal-arbitration-act individual-arbitration iskanian-rule paga-claims preemption private-attorneys-general-act
Key Terms:
Arbitration LaborRelations ClassAction
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act

Docket Entries

2022-10-17
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2022-10-13
Joint motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 filed.
2022-09-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 31, 2022.
2022-09-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 30, 2022 to October 31, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-07-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 30, 2022.
2022-07-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 22, 2022 to September 30, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-05-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including July 22, 2022.
2022-05-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 31, 2022 to July 22, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 31, 2022.
2022-04-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2021 to May 31, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-03-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 29, 2022.
2022-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2022 to April 29, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 31, 2022.
2022-01-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 31, 2022 to March 31, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including January 31, 2022.
2021-11-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 1, 2021 to January 31, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 1, 2021.
2021-09-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 20, 2021 to December 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-20
Response Requested. (Due October 20, 2021)
2021-09-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-08-17
Brief amicus curiae of Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
2021-07-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 27, 2021)

Attorneys

Jacob Rimler, et al.
Shannon Liss-RiordanLichten & Liss-Riordan, P.C., Respondent
Postmates, LLC (F/K/A Postmastes, Inc.)
Theane Evangelis KapurGibson, Dunn and Crutcher, LLP, Petitioner
Retail Litigation Center, Inc.
Eric F. CitronGoldstein & Russell, P.C., Amicus