Carolyn L. Baburka v. Township of Hazlet, New Jersey, et al.
Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess FourthAmendment Privacy
1. Did the courts below commit error by deciding
the case based solely on New Jersey State law,
failing to give any recognition to federal law such as
42 U.S. Code Sections 1983 and 1988 and the 4th, 5th
and 14th Amendments to the United States Consti
tution?
2. Was the petitioner not only entitled to an
expectation of her rights of privacy, but also to a trial
jury concerning her injuries?
3. Under what circumstances is a police officer not
entitled to qualified immunity?
4. Were all defendants deliberately indifferent
to the rights of the petitioner to receive a reasonable
conducted search of petitioner 's body prior to entering
the courtroom?
Did the courts below commit error by failing to recognize federal law?