Can a judge ignore a party' challenge to his impartiality, maintain jurisdiction and abuse his adjudicative authority to extort the challenging party as the Ninth Circuit held?

Or^ Does the Ninth Circuit' decision establishes a precedent that legitimizes:

discrimination against a self represented litigant, and;

Extortion from that litigant?

(i)

(ii)

Can a judge ignore a party's challenge to his impartiality, maintain jurisdiction and abuse his adjudicative authority to extort the challenging party?