No. 21-1129

Wen-Ting Zheng-Smith v. Nassau Health Care Corporation, dba NUHealth System, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2022-02-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: academic-reviews attorney attorney-conduct civil-procedure court-discretion evidence evidence-submission government-findings judicial-procedure legal-evidence witness-statements witness-testimony
Latest Conference: 2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)

The District Judge in this case directed the plaintiffs attorney to submit evidence through the defense's attorney. Can that evidence be presented by the defendant's attorney on the behalf of the plaintiff, be updated to include the correct and missing information that was submitted? A substantial amount if relevant information to include witness statements, official government findings, academic reviews, emails and text messages were not included as evidence which would have collaborated the plaintiffs claims, and thus countering false information submitted by the defendants.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can evidence presented by defendant's attorney on behalf of plaintiff be updated to include missing information?

Docket Entries

2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-24
Waiver of right of respondent Nassau Health Care Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2022-01-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 17, 2022)

Attorneys

Nassau Health Care Corporation, et al.
Rachel Demarst GoldAbrams Fensterman, LLP, Respondent
Wen-Ting Zheng-Smith
Wen-Ting Zheng-Smith — Petitioner