No. 21-110
GMAG, LLC, et al. v. Ralph S. Janvey, as Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Limited, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure court-of-appeals due-process factual-dispute jury-trial jury-verdict legal-ruling ponzi-scheme seventh-amendment transferee-liability
Latest Conference:
2021-12-10
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Seventh Amendment and due process permit a court of appeals to reverse a jury verdict based on the court's own independent examination of a trial record to answer disputed factual questions that were never presented to or resolved by the jury.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Seventh Amendment and due process permit a court of appeals to reverse a jury verdict based on the court's own independent examination of a trial record to answer disputed factual questions that were never presented to or resolved by the jury
Docket Entries
2021-12-13
Petition DENIED.
2021-11-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
2021-11-23
Reply of petitioners GMAG, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-11-08
Brief of respondents Ralph S. Janvey, as Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Limited, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-09-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 8, 2021.
2021-09-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 8, 2021 to November 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-09-08
Response Requested. (Due October 8, 2021)
2021-08-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-20
Waiver of right of respondent Ralph S. Janvey, as Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Limited, et al. to respond filed.
2021-07-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2021)
Attorneys
GMAG, LLC, et al.
Paul D. Clement — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner
Ralph S. Janvey, as Receiver for the Stanford International Bank Limited, et al.
Kevin Marshall Sadler — Baker Botts L.L.P., Respondent