No. 21-1083
Response Waived
Tags: 6th-amendment criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process law-enforcement-contact miranda-rights right-to-attorney right-to-counsel right-to-remain-silent sixth-amendment state-magistrates
Key Terms:
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
DueProcess CriminalProcedure
Latest Conference:
2022-03-25
Question Presented (from Petition)
Issue 1. Following the police reading of the rights enumerated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), how long after a person in custody asserts his/her 6th Amendment right to counsel is contact with an attorney required.
Issue 2. Are state magistrates required to tell a recent arrestee, who is brought before them that what the arrestee says may be used against him/her; that the arrestee has a right to remain silent; and that the arrestee has a right to have an attorney, before further proceedings occur
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Miranda-rights-after-assertion
Docket Entries
2022-03-28
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/25/2022.
2022-03-02
Waiver of right of respondent Commonwealth of Virginia to respond filed.
2022-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Commonwealth of Virginia
Andrew Nathan Ferguson — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Jay Hoon Choi
Marvin David Miller — The Law Offices of Marvin D. Miller, Petitioner