1. Petitioner's trial counsel accidentally opened the
door to devastating extraneous offense evidence.
Could reasonable jurists disagree with the district
court's conclusion, contrary to this Court's holdings
in Wiggins v. Smith , 539 U.S. 510 (2003), Hinton v.
Alabama , 571 U.S. 263 (2014), and Wood v. Allen ,
558 U.S. 290 (2010), that counsel's inadvertent act
was "strategic"?

2. Could reasonable jurists also disagree with the
district court's conclusion that Petitioner had not
overcome 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)'s re-litigation bar and
shown that trial counsel's mistake was prejudicial?

Whether trial counsel's inadvertent act was 'strategic'