1. Whether plaintiffs ' erroneously given "inferior status "
and denied the right to redress the UNITED STATES
on obligations such as certificates of indebtedness and
federal income tax returns on "United States " tax
liability issues by denying access to the court because
of false threshold reasons under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6)
of the ("RCFC ") can collaterally attack the federal
employees bonds, risk management policies and
equity under 26 U.S.C. 2203; 26 U.S.C. 2002;18
U.S.C. 242; and 26 U.S.C. 7203 ?

2. Whether Federal Court Clerks and Judges erroneously
labeled the United States as "government " allowing
the assumption that the United States has "sovereign
immunity from suit" under the grounds of United
States v. Sherwood. 312 U.S. 584, 586 (1941) can deny
plaintiffs ' who are indigenous people and secured
party creditors due process of the law and the right to
redress tax fraud and original issue discount abuse by
the United States under 18 U.S.C. 1028 can be
collaterally attacked by plaintiffs ' under 28
U.S.C.3002; and 18 U.S.C.242?

3. Whether the United States can erroneously limit the
definition of debt instruments to Federal Reserve
Notes under 26 U.S.C. 1273
systemically keep private bankers / secured party
creditors from using their exemption provided in
House Joint Resolution 192 and public law 73.10 can
be sued 12 U.S.C. 1813(l)(l)(2)?

4. Whether plaintiffs ' debt instruments issued with
original issue discount in the actual or constructive
possession of the United States Employees are
includable as gross income under 26 USC section 61
can collaterally attack federal employees bonds,1275 while it
equity and risk management policies under 26 U.S.C.
7201 and 18U.S.C.242?

5. Whether plaintiffs ' who 's original issue discount has
been abused and erroneously used by the United
States State and Federal Judges under the Internal
Revenue Service Publication 1212 concerning
nominee can collaterally attack the United States and
its agents under 12 U.S.C. 378 (a)(l)(2)(b); and 26
C.F.R. 1.701-2?

6. Whether a plaintiffs ' debt instrument issued with
original issue discount and in the actual or
constructive possession of the United States Judge(s)
erroneously held as illegal contraband makes the
United States Judges "executor " and Liable for the
taxes during a taxable termination event can be
collaterally attacked by plaintiffs ' under 26 U.S.C.
2203; 26 U.S.C. 2002; and 26 C.F.R. 1.701-2?

7. Whether plaintiffs ' erroneously not given the required
copy of the 1099 OID showing plaintiffs ' as the payor
of the

Whether plaintiffs' erroneously given 'inferior status' and denied the right to redress the UNITED STATES on obligations such as certificates of indebtedness and federal income tax returns on 'United States' tax liability issues by denying access to the court because of false threshold reasons under 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) can be collaterally attacked