1) Whether additional evidence of claims occurring
while a judgment is pending and immediately af
ter case closure merit recall of a mandate.

2) Whether Fourth Amendment concerns over cell
phone intrusion and current public debate over
FBI abuses of power embody the "exceptional im
portance " criteria for en banc review.

3) Whether a petitioner proceeding Pro Se through
out his litigation be held to stringent standards of
pleadings to justify dismissal of his claims, even
with relevant evidence submitted.

Whether additional evidence of claims occurring while a judgment is pending and immediately after case closure merit recall of a mandate