The Fifth Circuit vastly departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings and sanctioned the same by the lower court. Both the lower courts were asked and obligated yet refused to determine its jurisdiction and both acted beyond their authority. This raises an alarming question on whether there is institutional discrimination against pro se litigants or, on the other hand, whether there is considerable partiality towards a party that has egregiously committed fraud.

1. Whether the lower courts acted ultra vires and the judgments below are void.

2. Whether petitioner was deprived of her statutory right to appeal and whether her substantial rights to due process and equal protection were violated.

3. Whether the lower courts' orders constitute an expansion of judicial power beyond Article III, in violation of the separation of power doctrine.

4. Whether the lower courts' judgments are contrary to statute and precedents set by this Court and held in accordance by all other circuits.

5. Whether this case squarely presents the exigencies to provide litigants stronger due process protections when courts act sua sponte; a highly debated question touched but not yet resolved by this Court.

Whether the lower courts acted ultra vires and the judgments below are void