No. 21-1009
Oklahoma v. Robert Taylor Bragg
Tags: civil-rights criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law due-process indian-country indian-law jurisdiction mcgirt-precedent mcgirt-v-oklahoma non-indian-defendants state-prosecution tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
2. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-08-01
MANDATE ISSUED
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-04-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-21
Brief of respondent Robert Taylor Bragg in opposition filed.
2022-02-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 21, 2022.
2022-02-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 17, 2022 to March 21, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-20
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2022-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 17, 2022)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Robert Taylor Bragg
Joseph T. Thai — Respondent