No. 20-995

Anthony Vetri v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 4th-amendment aiding-and-abetting cellphone-data cellphone-privacy criminal-procedure digital-privacy evidence-search fourth-amendment particularity probable-cause search-and-seizure warrant-requirements
Key Terms:
Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-02-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Fourth Amendment requires more stringent privacy considerations in authorizing a warrant for the seizure of a cellphone and the manner its data is search.

2. Whether the District court and court of appeals for the third circuit erred in determining the government met its burden to support a conviction under the advance knowledge requirement for aiding and abetting a murder under 924(j)(l) and 2, announced in Rosemond v. United States, 572 U.S. 65, 134 S.Ct. 1240, 188 L.Ed.2d 248 (2014) or The Pinkerton v. United States, under 28 U.S. 640 (1947) reasonably foreseeable requirement.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourth Amendment requires more stringent privacy considerations in authorizing a warrant for the seizure of a cellphone and the manner its data is search

Docket Entries

2021-03-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-22
Supplemental brief of petitioner Anthony Vetri filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.
2021-02-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-11-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Anthony Vetri
Anthony Vetri — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent