No. 20-980

Veena Sharma v. Santander Bank

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2021-01-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-crime judicial-review preclusion standing statute-of-limitations summary-judgment
Latest Conference: 2021-03-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit
decision of dismissing Petitioner 's claim without issuing summons to
Respondent, without any hearing, and without jury trial as requested by
Petitioner is sufficient for review by the honorable United States Supreme
Court.

2. Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit
decision of dismissing Petitioner 's claim on wrong/incorrect interpretation of
Statue of Limitations (10 years) is sufficient for review by the honorable
United States Superior Court.

3. Whether the District Court and U.S. Appeals Court for the First Circuit
decision of dismissing Petitioner 's claim on grounds of Preclusion is sufficient
for review by the honorable Untied States Supreme Court.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-district-court-and-appeals-court-dismissal-is-sufficient-for-review

Docket Entries

2021-03-29
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-12
Reply of petitioner Veena Sharma filed. (Distributed)
2021-03-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.
2021-02-23
Brief of respondent Santander Bank in opposition filed.
2020-12-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2021)

Attorneys

Santander Bank
Patrick S. TraceyBowditch & Dewey, LLP, Respondent
Veena Sharma
Veena Sharma — Petitioner