1. Whether or not, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals committed a Reversible Error, by concluding that, "the Petitioner fails to address how the District Court erred by dismissing his action for failure to state a claim"?

2. Whether or not, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals abused its Discretion by denying the Petitioner's timely filed, Petition for Panel Rehearing, which reiterated the Petitioner's Opening Brief for a Lost Legal Mail and which was the overlooked or misapprehended point of fact or law?

3. Whether or not, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals exceeded its Jurisdiction, therein, for the Plaintiff's Complaint, dismissed under Rule 12(b)(6), failure to state a claim, "under, Neitzke v. Williams 490 U.S. 319 (1989) 109 S.Ct., 1827, 104 L.Ed. 2d 338, at 326 and 329, which found by a 9-0, vote that it had in fact stated a cognizable claim " was specific to the factual case before it?

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals committed reversible error