1. Whether a state trial court can create a hybrid form of contempt which avoids traditional constitutional and legislative safeguards and prevents appellate review through creating mootness.

2. Whether the application of mootness to a contempt finding allows for a denial of appellate review of the underlying restraining order that constitutes a prior restraint of speech and a disfranchisement of the right to petition when doing so forecloses any future review as well.

Whether a state trial court can create a hybrid form of contempt which avoids traditional constitutional and legislative safeguards and prevents appellate review through creating mootness