1) Whether the failure of this Court to timely respond to the Motions impeded Appellant's ability to present their case thereby denying Appellants constitutional right to access to the Courts and of due process

2) Whether the trial court properly; considered all conditions presented that prompted the Motions in seemingly determining there was not sufficient cause to establish entitlement to approval of either or both of the Motions

3) Whether denial of either Motion was improper because Oklahoma law is clear that Appellant was entitled to make those Motions and did so, based on information and belief and expectations derived from prior observation of actions taken in the previous and underlying actions and experience — within adequate time for this Court to respond.

4) Whether the resultant injury i.e denial of Petition for Rehearing, caused by this lack of action was a denial of Appellants constitutional right to access to the Courts and of due process

5) Whether COCA 's dismissal and striking of attempt to bring attention to the error on August 2, 2019 (although mistitled) is further proof of failure to review documents submitted.

Whether the Court erred in denying Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time and Application to Exceed Page Limit