①. Does the petitioners "Wrongfully Excluded" actual innocence evidence allow the petitioner to gain review of his actual innocence claim under the Schlup V. Delo, 513 U.S. 298?

2. Does the claim demonstrate that the appointed counsel's deficient "Probably Resulted" in the conviction of an actually innocent person, Pursuant to Bousley V. United States, 523 U.S. 614?

3. Does the "Newly Discovered" evidence clause of Title 28 U.S.C. section 2244(b), Title 28 U.S.C. section 2255(h), Title 28 U.S.C. section 2241 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) unconstitutionally restrict the actual innocence inquiry to "Newly Discovered" evidence considerations, when well-established Supreme Court rulings require "Wrongfully Excluded"

Whether the petitioner's actual innocence claim is unconstitutionally restricted by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure