No. 20-916
Nathaniel K. Hooker v. Illinois
Tags: adversarial-proceeding criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance probable-cause right-to-bear-arms right-to-counsel right-to-effective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2020-11-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
This case presents an important issue concerning the proper application of Illinois Criminal Procedures and the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Counsel, coupled with the original right to Petition (according to Lord Coke), as well as the Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms, which is undoubtedly the Right to Defend Oneself.
DID THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WILL COUNTY ERRONEOUSLY DEPRIVE THE DEFENDANT OF HIS SIXTH AMEDNMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL DURING HIS CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Circuit Court of Will County erroneously deprived the defendant of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel during his criminal proceedings
Docket Entries
2021-03-11
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-02-17
Motion to dismiss pursuant Rule 46.2 filed by petitioner.
2020-11-23
Motion (20M41) for leave to proceed as a veteran Denied.
2020-11-04
MOTION (20M41) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.
2020-10-26
Motion (20M41) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2020-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Nathaniel K. Hooker
Nathaniel K. Hooker — Petitioner