No. 20-90
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement sixth-amendment strickland-standard subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did Slone sufficiently meet his burden under Strickland such that the District and Circuit courts should have granted his petition for a Certificate of Appealability, and does the Certificate scheme, as currently constructed, pass constitutional muster?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did Slone sufficiently meet his burden under Strickland
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2020-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 28, 2020)
Attorneys
Eugene Slone
Ned B. Pillersdorf — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Jeffrey B. Wall — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent