No. 20-8461

In Re Richard Charles Lussy

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-06-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights civil-torts due-process federal-questions jury-trial mandamus ministerial-mandamus oath-of-office public-charge standing
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

Order-#1-Ouestion : Of Hon. John Roberts Chief ("HJRC ") Justice: £1} ministerial mandamus act is "clear legal duty" with no discretion (mca§27-26- io2) for his time, treasure & talent as sworn Law Enforcement Officer to-perform: £U1 MOOF Warranty Assumption of Risk as-public-charge against Joined 19-Respondents (79%-Lawyers), least suitable or competent employ: untrained in jury trial/moot court/mock trials with juris doctor diploma & no doctor experience (iii) order leave to amend complaint co-signed by competent lawyer: satisfy 2-judges for 100% JTV-DP-R[ fn#2 &#ie].

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner has a clear legal duty for the Chief Justice to perform a ministerial mandamus act, despite the respondents' alleged errors and violations of rules, and whether the petitioner is entitled to amend the complaint with the support of a competent lawyer

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Rehearing DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-10-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main DocumentMain DocumentProof of Service
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisProof of ServicePetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Richard Lussy
Richard Charles Lussy — Petitioner