No. 20-8458
Patrick Eugene Stein v. United States
IFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process jury-act jury-selection standing tenth-circuit weapon-of-mass-destruction
Latest Conference:
2021-10-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does this practice substantially violate the plain language of the Jury Act under 28 U.S.C. § 1861, and was the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals wrong to decide that the codefendants' motion under the act was untimely?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does this practice substantially violate the plain language of the Jury Act under 28 U.S.C. § 1861, and was the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals wrong to decide that the codefendants' motion under the act was untimely?
Docket Entries
2021-11-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021.
2021-09-29
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-08-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 29, 2021.
2021-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 30, 2021 to September 29, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 30, 2021.
2021-07-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 30, 2021 to August 30, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2021)
Attorneys
Patrick Stein
Meredith Esser — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent