No. 20-8443
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure defendant-statement due-process evidence jury-charge jury-instructions motion-to-quash photographic-evidence right-to-counsel state-created-impediment trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
ERISA DueProcess CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Louisiana Supreme Court error in denying review after a. State-crested impediment occurred?
2. Whether ihe trial court erred in admittmg defendants statement at trial?
3. Whether the trial court erred in {buying the Motion to Quash the superseding short form iiKlictoent?
4. Whether the trial court erred in admitting speculative phot.m2
5. Whether die trial court erred m including the Staf.eS requested j ury charge?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court erred in admitting the defendant's statement, denying the motion to quash the superseding indictment, admitting speculative photos, and including the State's requested jury charge
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent Louisiana to respond filed.
2021-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 29, 2021)
Attorneys
Jacobie A. Green
Jacobie A. Green — Petitioner
Louisiana
Shae Gary McPhee Jr. — Louisiana Department of Justice, Respondent