No. 20-8441

Thomas Kenneth Mills v. California, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process free-speech religious-freedom standing takings
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

WAS
OF
APPROpRiFTELY
sidE
ThE
Ris pERdAL'S
EFFECT
OF
2
LAW
FAEQRE
FIRMp
ThE
UAS
REATT LLP,
BIDDLE DRINKER,+
who
And
ThERE
ATTORNEY
REPRESENTEd
The
JANSSEN
PHARMACEATERL'S INC,
dEPOSITIONIN
WE1
76
in
J8UP
THE
PLAiNTTFF
ThE
ia
BC6S2652,And
PER,
NumbER
PRO
.IN CARCERATEd
INCARATEC, AS THEIR
Wm
Is
DANSSEN
PHARMACEUTICA
(hE
And
LiabLE
INe, REspoNsiblE
dAMAGES
To
FOR
ThE
CHEST SiNCE
ThEy
UPPER
hum
And
P708
dEFECTIVE
FACEREd
X
PRoduET?
JuCGEMER
why
WAS ?NT
SYMWARY
hm
SUPERiOR
COuRt
iN
WOTION
ThE

Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-the-pharmacist's-refusal-to-fill-a-prescription-violates-the-patient's-constitutional-rights

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 28, 2021)

Attorneys

Thomas K. Mills
Thomas K. Mills — Petitioner