Michael T. Hughes v. Kim Anderson, et al.
Dow comes An Appellant in this Certiorari to request these High Tribunal to determine whether The Fourthward District of Illinois over asserted US civil authority and First, Dismissing Plaintiff/Appellant's civil actions with Prejudice by Gram in the belly Secured evidence that violated Appellant's Constitutional rights & bain Second, 083 la'd tina Same information te tyetwo chin Plaintiff/Appellant Geom Gini Cosy fucker actions and be lus paid eft oil of big io standin b fees th vw ceat lan mo Socom of tax on an Tach ent Detaiaces cole likely is hel dl these necvirtalele axe the ulAy etiovs Soshaned ond that ace donbinwal to this day, Lb mest also be iaoted dat He Executive Committee "Ens owed" the Plaintiff wrtwot a he aC Vin 0¢ npger tun. h why fo foe heacdy wilh the pre terbusas ot mn debvinees test donc Compovad ingly ita ¢ may ct 100 0% ag Whats test Pend oe dinly wi as the PL {LA PD Cos hes « loot dinky Cine Hine ' Sins ' ivwe a a ~to- Lumley loan of Hygitve aud leagrl Sopaced
Whether the Petitioner's constitutional rights were violated when the Northern District of Illinois dismissed their claims with prejudice and denied them the same information provided to the two other plaintiffs