I. WHETHER OTHERWISE INADMISSIBLE NONTESTIMONIAL HEARSAY, WHICH FALLS WITHIN NO STATUTORY HEARSAY EXCEPTION, ADMITTED FOR NON-HEARSAY PURPOSE AND THEREAFTER USED FOR THEIR TRUTH AS SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE VIOLATES THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE AND RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL?

II. WHETHER THE STATE COURT VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?

III. WHETHER A COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO MOVE TO SUPPRESS AN ACCUSED'S POST-POLYGRAPH STATEMENTS PURSUANT TO WYRICK V FIELDS, 459 U.S. 42 (1982) CONSTITUTES INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL UNDER STRICKLAND?

Whether otherwise inadmissible nontestimonial hearsay admitted for non-hearsay purpose and thereafter used for their truth as substantive evidence violates the Confrontation Clause and right to a fair trial