No. 20-8426

Bin Yang v. California Board of Registered Nursing

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-06-24
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection expert-testimony government-agency government-misconduct licensing-board standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-01-07 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Why is Petitioner NOT ALLOWED to withdraw her application from a nursing
board (quit) while she could do so from medical boards?

2. Why is Petitioner not allowed to have "a mental exam " from a university expert
who can best ensure public safety but "the expert " who will say anything that
Respondent desires?

3. Is it unconstitutional for licensing agents to set innocent up with "their experts, "
AGAIN AND AGAIN, causing tremendous personal and family losses and
suffering?

4. Is it unconstitutional for the justice system to actively and inactively assist the
government agencies to violate law, set innocents up, legalize their crime, and
get paid, AGAIN AND AGAIN?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Why is Petitioner NOT ALLOWED to withdraw her application from a nursing-board

Docket Entries

2022-01-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
2021-10-08
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main Document
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-16
Waiver of right of respondent California Board of Registered Nursing to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-06-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 26, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Bin Yang
Bin Yang — Petitioner
California Board of Registered Nursing
Diann Sokoloff — Office of the Attorney General-Dept. of Justice, Respondent