1. This Court should grant review to determine whether and in what circumstances such a Certificate of Appealabilty issued can be vacated.

2. This Court should grant review to determine whether an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based upon a matter of state law violates a specifically Wis. Stat. 971.08 and State v. bangert defendants Ferderal Constitutional right and therefore illistrative of denial of a substantial constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel, mandating grant of Certificate of Appealability in this case.

3. Wisconsin State Courts unreasonably determined that Deichsel's appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to argue on direct appeal the nonfrivolous meritorious claim regarding the defective plea colloquy.

Whether a Certificate of Appealability can be vacated