No. 20-8407

Daniel Littlepage v. Tim Shoop, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-murder criminal-procedure due-process orc-2945.06 plea-bargaining post-release-control sentencing three-judge-panel
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Is the Petitioner's Due Process Rights Violated Due to the
requiring a Three-Judge Panel Violation of O.R.C. ' 2945.06
for Aggravated Murder?

2. Is the Petitioner's Due Process Rights Violated Due to the
Violation of Crim.R. 11(C)(3) , requiring a Three-Judge Panel
for Aggravated Murder?

3. Is Due Process Violated when the Court accepts a "Guilty" Plea
before explaining Crim.R. 11, especially Crim.R. 11(C)(3) for
Aggravated Murder as required?

4. Is Due Process and Q.R.C. 2967.28 Violated by Imposing Post-
Release Control (PRC) in a Aggravated Murder Case for which
Parole is the only eligibility for Petitioner?

3. Is Due Process Violated when the Trial Court Fails to inform
the Petitioner of the Elements of the Charge and Specification
to which he pleads to in an Aggravated Murder Case?

6. Is a Plea Knowingly and Intelligently made when the Trial
Court Fails to inform the Petitioner of the Elements of the
Charge and Specifications in a Aggravated Murder Case?

7. Is a Plea Knowingly and Intelligently made when the Trial
Court Imposes Two (2) conflicting sentencing sanctions, (PRC)
and Parole in a Aggravated Murder Case? (A Due Process Vio
lation)

g.IIs the Petitioner Entitled to Plead Anew when the Trial Court
Imposes sentencing sanctions that are contrary to law in an
Aggravated Murder Case? (A Due Process Violation)

9. Is Due Process Violated when Petitioner At Sentencing States
that he Wants to Withdraw his "Guilty " Plea and it is left
Out of the Unsigned Sentencing Transcripts?

10. Is the Petitioner Entitled to Plead Anew when the Sentencing
Transcripts have been Altered and are Unsigned as required?
(See Page 25 of Trial Transcripts Labeled Appendix G_ Herein)

11. Does the Criminal Behavior of a Trial Judge who Executes
Fraudulent Orders (See Appendix I) Herein) Prove Bias, Par
tiality and Corruption?

12. Does the Illegal Creation and Execution of Appendix I) Here
in Violate 28 U.S.C. 47 and Due Process ?

13. Does a Judge lose their Immunity when they Craete Fraudulent
Orders with N£ Authority or Jurisdiction ? (See Appendix I)
Herein)

14. Once 28 U.S.C. 47 is Violated as is Proven in Appendix D Here
in, is the Judge Guilty of "Using Sham Legal Process " A Vio
lation of O.R.C. 2921.52?

15. Once 28 U.S.C. 47 is Violated as is Proven in Appendix D Here
in, is the Judge Guilty of "Impersonating " A Violation of
O.R.C. 2921

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the Petitioner's Due Process Rights Violated Due to the Violation of O.R.C. 2945.06, requiring a Three-Judge Panel for Aggravated Murder?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-21
Waiver of right of respondent Tim Shoop to respond filed.
2021-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)

Attorneys

Daniel Littlepage
Daniel Littlepage — Petitioner
Tim Shoop
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent