1. Should a Mandated order issued by a United States Appeals Court [Specifically, the Hon. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals] be struck down by a decision of a United States District Court-specifically-U.S. District Court the Middle District-Florida, that it did-not agree with the mandated decision. Henceforth, subjecting a plaintiff, to consecutive appealsTo reverse, arid by that very same conduct of the District Court-the longevity of those appeals-bring the civil case to the door of the Statue of Limitations. Is this the Justice-and Judicial system that the United States represent. Further, should this type conduct be tolerated by the United States District Court-Middle District FI. in removing access to the Courts for indigent individuals. [Those that are not represented-or cannot afford counsel. Furthermore, would it be considered violation of a Civil Liberty of the US Constitution, being that one of the five key-civil liberties is "the right to petition the government for redress of grievances [ Wherefore, why would the appellant, be denied this privilege]. [2] Did the District Court, abuse discretion in holding case from progress up near Statute of Limitations? though case is timelyT *filed.

Should a mandated order issued by a United States Appeals Court be struck down by a decision of a United States District Court, subjecting a plaintiff to consecutive appeals and bringing the civil case to the door of the Statute of Limitations?