David Simmons v. Earl Houser, Superintendent, Goose Creek Correctional Center
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN FAILING
TO GIVE DEFERENCE TO THE STATE SUPREME,COURT'S
DETERMINATION THAT PETITIONER'S ADMINISTRATIVE
REMEDIES HAD BEEN EXHAUSTED.
WHETHER THE DISTRICT ;COURT ERRED IN REFUSING
TO CONSIDER PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIM
VIOLATIONS: THAT THE STATE SUPREME COURT'S RE
TROACTIVE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2003 AMENDMENT,TO
THE ALASKA DNA I.D. REGISTRATION ACT,AS; APPLIED,.
TO PETITIONER, WHOSE CONVICTION PRE-DATED THE
OPERATION OF THE DIRECTIVES OF THE STATUTE WHICH
CAME INTO 3EING AS AN EXISTING LAW, AND PUNITIVE
-LY SANCTIONED NONE COMPLIANCE, WITHOUT OFFEND
ING r THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14TH AMENDMENT
AND THE EX POST FACTO C..CLAUSES OF THE UNITED
STATES CONSTITUTION-ART l,SECT£ON 10.
Whether the district court erred in failing to give deference to the state supreme court's determination that petitioner's administrative remedies had been exhausted