No. 20-8376
Jay Earl Haynes v. Bert Boyd, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-circuit standard-of-review tennessee-corrections warden
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERRERED IN DENYING THE
CRETIFICATE OF APPEALIBILITY?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in denying the certificate of appealability?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-22
Waiver of right of respondent Bert Boyd to respond filed.
2020-11-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2021)
Attorneys
Bert Boyd
Richard Davison Douglas — State of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
Jay Earl Haynes
Jay Earl Haynes — Petitioner