No. 20-8373

Kevin Herriott v. Associate Warden Ford, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-06-22
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights discovery due-process federal-review habeas-corpus jurisdictional-requirements legal-mail mail-room procedural-law standing state-court-conviction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) DID THE COURT OF APPEALS MISUNDERSTOOD THE GOVERNING RULE OF LAW THAT THE RIGHT TO DISCOVERY WAS PREDICATED UPON?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the court of appeals misunderstood the governing rule of law that the right to discovery was predicated upon?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-22
Brief of respondents Associate Warden Ford, et al. in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of Service
2021-01-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 22, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of Service

Attorneys

Associate Warden Ford, et al.
Andrew Frederick Lindemann — Lindemann & Davis, P.A., Respondent
Kevin Herriott
Kevin E. Herriott — Petitioner