No. 20-8351
Kevin Herriott v. Aaron Joyner, et al.
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction federal-procedure judicial-dismissal pro-se-litigation standing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) DID THE COURT OF APPEALS IMPROPERLY REVERSED THE DISTRICT COURT ON THE ISSUE OF LAW OF WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT HAD VALID SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION OVER PARTIES § 1983 CLAIMS?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court had proper subject-matter jurisdiction over parties' § 1983 claims
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-21
Brief of respondents Aaron Joyner, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-02-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 21, 2021)
Attorneys
Aaron Joyner, et al.
Andrew Frederick Lindemann — Lindemann & Davis, P.A., Respondent
Kevin Herriott
Kevin E. Herriott — Petitioner