QUESTION 1* Whether the failure to include testing and treatment of Lyme
spirochete Bb as a pre-trial requirement of all criminal and most civil cases under
the 42 USC 1983 Federal Civil Rights Act, particularly in the West annotations,
section 2766 Medical care, pretrial detainees, generally , section 2767 Serious
medical need\ medical care, pretrial detainees, section 1603 Medical malpractice.
deprivation of constitutional or statutory rights, and section 1604. Medical service.
deprivation of constitutional or statutory rishts. because of a number of sometimes
conflicting developments in the science of medicine, l) efforts to conceal Lyme
germ warfare agent since about 1993 in the early stages of the Bill Clinton
presidency, and 2) the uncanny ability of the Lyme spirochete, hereinafter Bb, to
almost instantaneously sense danger from antibiotics and curl up into a ball and
exude a wax protective shield or protective film or biofilm and thereafter
inside the biofilm and inactive even for years until danger passes after Bb
danger in the form of antibiotics or even soap and antiseptics, greatly reducing the
intended effect antibiotics and pre-surgical cleaning, had until 2013 discovery of
stevia as an ajuvant, resulted in widely held beliefs that lyme was a fictitious
disease.as a
remam
senses

QUESTION 2- Whether the 2016 election of Donald Trump has led to the
acceptance of the 300 world wide Lyme species as no longer being a fictional
disease. In 1999*2000 one ILADS founder, Dr Joe Burrascano, MD of the
International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society, hereinafter ILADS, was sued
and brought into a civil trial in Manhattan, New York City on charges brought by
the New York State Medical Boards in a deprivation of license trial, for about a one
year trial in 1999*2000, on 33 charges basically alleging Burrascano was wrongly
practicing medicine to treat a nonexistent or fictional disease, prosecuted for his
discoveries regarding Lyme disease then thought to be a fictional disease and use of
powerful antibiotics than others had previously used to fight Lyme.
Burrascano won on 30 charges and had to do minor remedial work on the othermore
three charges, thanks, it is reported, to a judge who had personal knowledge that
Lyme was not fictional.

QUESTION 3- Will this court now order testing and treating of Lyme
necessary pretrial test and treatment in all crimin al and hopefully most civil cases.
In many criminal cases, there is an appearance of criminal activity where in fact the
behavior was largely or solely caused by a brain infection with Lyme and/or theas a
Rickettsia Helvetica or Swiss Agent, created a backlog of wrong or incorrect
trials in nearly all criminal and most civil cases in the nation 's courts since the
discovery of the Lyme spirochete in 1981 by Willi Burgdorfer at the Hamilton,
Montana laboratories of the US government called Rocky Mountain Laboratory (see
P 11, Bitten , The Secret History ofLvme Disease and Biological Weapons bv Kris
Newby, ISBN 978*

Question not identified